RSS Feed

Readings Week 7

0

Wednesday, October 17, 2012 by


Trust and Observer Partiality in Ethnographic Research - Responses to Week 7's Readings
In order for Ethnographic research to be of any significance, the Ethnographer must gain the trust of those under study.  Why is gaining trust so important?  Because once those under study recognize that the observer is not a threat, they are more inclined to act more naturally or normally as if they are not under a microscope.  Thinking about this truism, I am reminded of how trust is so important in any type of observer – participant interaction.  In the medical field, trust is paramount if Doctors or Psychologists are to identify a physical or mental illness, and its causation.  A patient, who doesn’t trust a physician, will not feel inclined to reveal personal information necessary for the diagnosis of an illness or disorder.  Information withheld could lead the physician to misdiagnose a patient.  Likewise in Ethnographic Research, if the partipants under study do not trust the Ethnographer, the behaviour they exhibit might not be representative of how they "normally" act.

This brings to light another point in Ethnographic research: The Ethnographer has to be very careful in drawing conclusions based upon their observations.  The Ethnographer's  mere presence could serve to alter the “normal” everyday interactions of the people or phenomena they are observing.  For example, I remember watching a nature documentary about a Zoologist observing the behaviour of a certain species of monkey.  Given her observations of how the monkeys moved from one area of the jungle to the other by swinging from tree branches, the Zoologist was initially led to believe that these monkeys travelled mainly by trees.  However, the Zoologist intuitively grasped that the behaviour exhibited by the monkeys was not typical.  Eventually, after many more days observing the monkeys, the monkeys exhibited a change in behaviour and started travelling on the ground by foot.   After observing this behaviour and how natural it appeared to the monkeys, the Zoologist then came to the understanding that these monkeys spent the vast majority of their time travelling along the jungle floor by foot and only when they felt threatened, they sought to travel the jungle canopy via treetop branches.  Inadvertently by her mere presence, the Zoologist was affecting the normal behaviour of the monkeys and only when the monkeys felt that the Zoologist was no longer a threat, did they resume their normal behaviour.  Similarily, the Ethnographer is not a neutral observer.  Given that they are forced to gain the trust of those they seek to study, at times they are forced to adopt a persona or image.  By doing so, they could be inadvertently shaping the behaviour of those under study. 


Leave a Reply

Powered by Blogger.